Talk:Politics of Rwanda

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Rwanda

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rwanda (assessed as Top-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Millerni96.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of Ambiguity[edit]

There are some strange sentences in this article, and it is in desperate need of an update. For example, one sentence reads, "Trying this many suspects of genocide will tax Rwanda's resources sorely." Ignoring the awkward wording and tense issues, the genocide had not been mentioned up until then. For those unfamiliar with the history of Rwanda, this would be a very strange sentence indeed. The section isn't sourced, so I don't even know if the statement is true; it's likely editorializing.

Then, there's this: "Kagame has not groomed anyone to be his successor, so there’s nothing that points to who his successor could or should be." This is following a discussion of the electoral process. It's straight out of an Economist article. It may be warranted, but a discussion of the skepticism towards Rwanda having a legitimate electoral process is necessary before interjecting with this.

As it stands, this article cites almost exclusively British sources (I though this was Politics of Rwanda) and is largely incoherent. I think that anyone trying to expand/clean-up this page (including myself) should first and foremost seek to diversify sources (needs way more African sources). Alexmunger (talk) 19:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice[edit]

The government section of the "Outline of Rwanda" needs to be checked, corrected, and completed -- especially the subsections for the government branches.

When the country outlines were created, temporary data (that matched most of the countries but not all) was used to speed up the process. Those countries for which the temporary data does not match must be replaced with the correct information.

Please check that this country's outline is not in error.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact The Transhumanist .

Thank you.

Links[edit]

[1](Lihaas (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIii — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.254.218 (talk) 23:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]