Talk:Political families of India

India: Politics Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in September 2021.

WP:SILVERLOCK :DELIBERATE VANDALISM INFLICTED BY INDIVIDUALS PROMOTING VESTED INTERESTS AND EXALTING A LOCAL FAMILY ON THE NATIONAL LEVEL::first BIHAR DEPUTY CHIEF MINISTER DR A N SINHA'S(1946-1957) FAMILY IS THE OLDEST AND WELL KNOWN POLITICAL FAMILY OF BIHAR AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL.HOWEVER,THEIR NAMES WERE SIDELINED TO PROMOTED A FAMILY WHICH IS SIMILAR TO COUNTLESS LOCAL POLITICAL FAMILIES OF INDIA WHERE RELATIVES BECOME MEMBERS OF LEGISLATURE.THE IP ADDRESS 117.226.177.68 HAS VIOLATED THE NEUTRALITY OF THE ARTICLE BY TRYING TO EXALT THE POSITION OF A HITHERTO UNKNOWN FAMILY OF INDIAN STATE OF BIHAR.This is relatively unimportant and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against the established policies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bn bt ec01 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BLP, Vandalism, Uncited claims about living persons[edit]

This page constitutes a Biography of a living person because it contains information about living people. False or uncited claims will be deleted immediately.

However I would contend this list is useful, so I would ask editors to: A. refrain from publishing the family connections of anyone without a reliable source B. not to delete persons on this list who have reliable citations as relatives without giving a reasons C. to be aware of the potential for edit warring on this page

If Citations are not given, most of this article will be deleted Regards, --Willthewanderer (talk) 06:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atrocious article[edit]

This is a truly horrible article. Half of its sections are incomplete, with red links thrown around everywhere. Which user thought it would be a good idea to make an article like this? TootsieRollsAddict (talk) 04:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove sections which already have a separate article[edit]

In my opinion the states for which there is a separate article should be removed and only the Main Article template of those states should be there. Please give your opinions on it. Xoocit (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]