Talk:Polish decrees

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Third Reich At War[edit]

This article would benefit tremendously from Richard J. Evans' new book, The Third Reich at War. I'm just getting to the section on forced labor in Poland. The section appears immensely detailed and contains many sources which could be further consulted to help lift this article to Class B status. - Tim1965 (talk) 16:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have the book, could you expand the article? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Balance POV[edit]

I am a novice editor, and not a Nazi. But thinking about this article in terms of NPOV, would the Nazi viewpoint, arguably a fringe viewpoint of course, be permissable? For instance, and this is a hypothetical, something like "Adolf Eichmann determined forced labor was more economical than paid labor and instituted policies to ..." Did I mention I am not a Nazi? It also makes me wonder if, for the sake of NPOV, would the KKK viewpoint on "minority inferiority" be permissable on say the racism article? And I am not a Klansman, in fact by virtue of my ethnicity a target of the KKK and anachronistically Natl. Soc. I think this exercise might help be better grasp NPOV. Lionelt (talk) 18:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Lionel, one does not have to be a Nazi to admit they were not all crazy :) I wrote an article on a terribly rational Nazi plan, the Hunger Plan, and I am not a Nazi, neither. I also would like to see Nazi economy article expanded. I suggest that you may want to add content to the forced labor in Nazi Germany article, as economics of forced labor is probably a bit too broad for this specific article (which deals with Nazi legislation on Polish forced laborers). Btw, I don't think that lack of discussion of economics is a neutrality problem, it is more of a traditional comprehensiveness problem. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Polish decrees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Polish decrees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]