Talk:Planetary engineering

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 3 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BennettWise, Charliea1919, Bmorelli2000, Nghealy.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project[edit]

A few of us have been trying to start up a new Wikipedia:WikiProject Space Colonization (shortcut WP:SPACE) to organize work on topics of direct relevance to planetary engineering. Hop on over if you're interested. - Reaverdrop 16:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Politics of geoengineering"[edit]

Should this section be here with out a reference? If you could Reference this please.Leapster 15:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, and hence why I've nuked it. If anyone wants to re-add, they know what to do. mdf 13:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GeoEngineering is a real discipline[edit]

Uh, guys... geoengineers actually exist - it's a subset of Civil Engineering. GeoEngineers and do the following things:

  • Foundation Engineering
  • Soil Mechanics (i.e. anytime you build any building you must look at the soil strength)
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Seismic Hazards/ Earthquakes
  • Rock Mechanics - e.g. tunnels, mines etc.
  • Geophysical Surveys
  • Dams/Hydro/ Levees (think Katrina)
  • Environmental remediation/design
  • Petroleum
  • Mining
  • Geology...
  • Tsunami stuff
  • ETC

ANY large scale Civil Engineering Product

[1]

I think you're thinking of Geotechnical Engineering[edit]

What UC Berkley calls "Geoengineering" is what most people would refer to as Geotechnical Engineering. In most of the current scientific literature (Science, Nature, etc), geoengineering is specifically the science of environmental remediation through large scale planning.

--Jhamon 13:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Methods of geoengineering[edit]

Should this article include descriptions of the various proposed methods of geoengineering and their possible benefits and drawbacks? 144.226.230.36 21:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be an excellent addition to this article. I'm doing research in this area anyway for a class so I might try to expand it some in my free time. --Jhamon 03:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For the methods, look at Stephen H. Salter and John Latham (cloudseeder-project), Paul J. Crutzen (sulpher spraying in atmosphere), looking about for the other ones. There was also a documentary that describes them all (think it was 4 episodes, i'll look for it)

KVDP (talk) 10:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: found documentairy and all extra geo-engineering methods. Look at external links at the main page or click here for the documentairy and here for the extra techniques (sea currents-project, ...)
UPDATE Included most of them myself, from the geoengineering blogspot some extra projects have not yet been described and the green wall project from the second documentary also needs adding. KVDP (talk) 12:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Include them in the article. Thanks. KVDP (talk) 12:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geoengineering is not the same as accidental climate change[edit]

Whoever wrote most of the geoengineering section seemed to be under the false impression that accidental human-induced climate change should be considered planetary engineering. of "engineering," however, implies intent that was not present during the industrial revolution beginnings of global warming.

Geoengineering is about planned environmental remediation. I've edited and clarified it somewhat, but it still needs work.

--Jhamon 13:39, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Planetary engineering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]