This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
Pittsburgh and Ohio Central is the full name of the railroad, should Pittsburgh and Ohio be wikified? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jimktrains (talk • contribs) .
No, in general we don't make parts of the subject name into links to other articles. Take a look at other articles about US railroads such as those listed on the Class III navbox shown below: {{US class 3}} Slambo(Speak) 13:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about not signing...Anyway, I was wondering because someone else made them so and I didn't just want to change them back without checking first. --Jimktrains 15:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'No Merger' As long as one of these short-lived short lines had some sort of independent existence, it would be a good idea to keep them separate. The separate articles are useful in figuring out the evolution of larger railroads, and may be useful for historical, legal, and genealogical reasons. Pustelnik (talk) 13:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The complexity of the short-line railroad industry is too great to merge articles like this one into other articles. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
