Talk:Pilotwings 64

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePilotwings 64 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 20, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Interview[edit]

Here is a juicy interview with some interesting data: http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=10220 -- ReyBrujo 21:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Music Correction[edit]

"Its soundtrack was also praised, particularly the jazz piece played during night missions, or..."

The soundtrack plays the same pieces regardless of time, so I'm not sure what this quote is exactly referring to. If anyone has more information, let me know. Otherwise, I'm simplifying this quote. 

—Preceding unsigned comment added by DaDude (talk • contribs) 01:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pilotwings 64/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Airplaneman talk 20:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist & comments[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I will copyedit myself unless I am not sure, in which case I will list the problems below for you to address:
    Under the "Gameplay" section, the lead sentence, Pilotwings 64 is a 3D flight simulator in which the player must complete a variety of missions using different airborne vehicles and aerial sports. I think it is meant to say something along the lines of Pilotwings 64 is a 3D flight simulator in which the player must complete a variety of missions using different airborne vehicles in many aerial sports events. or something. Please clarify. Airplaneman talk 20:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
     Done — will pass. Airplaneman talk 03:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Checklinks fine. Sources look good. Airplaneman talk 20:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pilotwings 64. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pilotwings 64. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Corrected formatting/usage for //www.nintendo.com/newsroom/pr/093096b.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pilotwings 64. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pilotwings_64&oldid=1204705408"