Talk:Pilot (30 Rock)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePilot (30 Rock) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starPilot (30 Rock) is part of the 30 Rock (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 9, 2008Good article nomineeListed
June 1, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 10, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 8, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 29, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 16, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
December 23, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
May 8, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Some possible refs[edit]

[1], [2], [3] [4] - Peregrine Fisher 16:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Hey, I've reviewed your article, and here are my suggestions-

Lead-

  • It needs to be stated that it was in the first season.
  • Is it an American only show, or did it premiere elsewhere? Edit-I see in the reception section that it premiered in the UK sometime, so the UK info date needs to be added.
  • No commas needed around "loose cannon film star".
  • The short paragraph at the end can be incorporated into the first paragraph, and since Fey is already introduced, we only need her last name.

Plot

  • Do "insane", "commuter"," restaurant", "hot dog", "southern fried chicken", "strip club", "live broadcast" really need to be linked?

Continuity

  • The second sentence is a bit confusing, especially the "the series but, the allusion" part.
  • Again, does "highway", "arrangements", or "singing" truly need to be linked?
  • Maroney has already been introduced.
  • The next to last sentence is confusing, but this might simply be due to comma placement.
  • The verb tense here doesn't reflect the rest of the article, not counting plot.

Production

  • Commas aren't needed around executive producer.
  • "....instead of appearing as Jenna." isn't needed, as it has already been established that she wouldn't be portraying Jenna.

Reception

Ratings

  • I'm guessing these statistics are Nielsen Ratings, so link Nielsen, and give a short explanation of what they mean.

Critical Response

  • A 67 doesn't explain much, but 67 out of *whatever the highest possible amount* does.
  • "...based on viewing the pilot episode", "...after watching "Pilot"", "Having viewed the original pilot...", etc, aren't needed as we know they've seen the episode.

Looks like a good article otherwise. Per GAN rules, one week (seven days) is an appropriate amount of time for these revisions to take place. Please message me at my talk page once these have been completed, and I will be happy to review the article again. Have a good day! Mastrchf91 (t/c) 04:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upon reviewing it a second time, I feel that this article is now GA-quality. Congratulations on the job well done! Mastrchf91 (t/c) 16:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC copy-edit[edit]

I've made it through the lead and first section so far. I have a few things that I'm unable to fix myself.

  • The series was given the green light to enter production in May 2006, after the production of this pilot episode. - Was the green light given in May 2006 or was production started in May 2006. Is the second clause redundant, since one cannot, by definition, continue with the rest of a series without making the pilot.
  • all viewers including adults aged between 18 and 49 - does this mean the group of all views PLUS the group of adults or the group of all viewers who are the named adults?
  • Liz Lemon is getting a hot dog before work when a conflict begins with a fellow commuter - This is in passive voice and shouldn't be, however, I'm not sure who started the conflict, so I can't fix it.
  • Against her own judgment, Liz meets with Tracy at a restaurant but they have to leave because it serves food that Tracy does not like. - This sentence is wordy, but I can't think of a good way to reduce it without losing meaning.

--Gimme danger (talk) 01:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naming convention discussion[edit]

At Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#TV pilot naming standards, there is a discussion about how articles about untitled pilots should be named. A change has been proposed which would affect this article. Regular editors of this page are invited to join the discussion. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 20:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pilot (30 Rock). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pilot (30 Rock). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pilot (30 Rock). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]