Talk:Peter Chao

Peter Chao has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 14, 2013. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Peter Chao appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that YouTube personality Peter Chao was forced to study in Canada by his "prostitute mother"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Chao.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Image[edit]

Has anyone tried contacting Mr. Tong for an image? -- Zanimum (talk) 21:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice try, alas that's a Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic" (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0), according to the Flickr uploader. We can't have "NonCommercial" for images on WP. -- Zanimum (talk) 15:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Peter Chao/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 19:14, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 19:14, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will be waiting... Actually I already have. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 14:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay just finished a review for Christopher Nolan, will get to this one soon as well. — Cirt (talk) 19:16, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination on hold[edit]

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of June 12, 2013, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?:

NOTE: Please respond below this entire review, and not interspersed in the individual points, thank you!
Writing quality is okay, but several points of recommendations:
Lede/intro sect - no need for citations here, per WP:LEAD, the material should be cited lower in the main article body text, and not in the lede intro unless specifically controversial.
Lede/intro sect - bit small, please expand, per WP:LEAD, lede/intro sect should adequately function as a standalone summary of the entire article contents.
Infobox - can more fields and info be added to the infobox?
Writing quality - please post to WP:GOCE requests page for previously uninvolved copyeditor, and to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects asking for help with copyediting. Even if they don't come before GA Review is over, still a good idea to go and make those requests.
Background - background of what? More specific title of this sect would be helpful.
Portals - please convert to {{Portal bar}} as footer at bottom of article and add some additional relevant portals, location of individual, etc.
See also - missing, consider adding some See also links to a sect called See also
Early life and education - a bit sparse, any more research for more info on this aspect please?

2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout. No issues here.

3. Broad in coverage?: See comments above about things to add.

4. Neutral point of view?: No issues here.

5. Article stability? No issues here. After inspection of article edit history going back over one month, and upon inspection of talk page.

6. Images?: No issues here. No images used.

NOTE: Please respond below this entire review, and not interspersed in the individual points, thank you!

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — Cirt (talk) 23:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! See also links would be redundant when the links are present as wiki links in the body itself, right? I have added a portal bar, more fields to the Infobox, stripped off the lede's citations, and beefed it up with words. I am just about to go to the copy editors' door. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 03:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the updates! Starting to look a bit better already. Please keep me posted here, below. — Cirt (talk) 05:51, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

Background is good enough, methinks. Anything more wordy reads like an old grandma's story. I have used just about everything to be found about his early life online. GA does not need to be overwhelmingly comprehensive too. Added "See also" -- Two links. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 05:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA passed[edit]

Good job addressing suggestions, above. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 16:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aligato gozaimasu. :) ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 22:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]