Talk:Peru at the 2010 Winter Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Peru at the 2010 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Going to take up this review. MWright96 (talk) 07:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Background[edit]

  • "and with the exception of the 1952 Helsinki Games has participated" - a comma is needed between "Games" and "has"

Alpine skiing[edit]

  • "but she failed to finish" - completed to avoid reptition of closely spelt wording
  • "finishing the first run in a time of 59 seconds, but failing to finish the second run." - end again to avoid reptition

Cross-country skiing[edit]

  • "and moving from Peru to Seattle, Washington" - sentence needs a period to complete it
  • "he finished with a time of 45 minutes and 53 seconds, finishing in 94th place out of 95 competitors." - placing 94th

References[edit]

  • Reference 2 should have its publication and access dates should be written as 13 February 2010 and 24 July 2011 in line with the rest of the citations

That is all I found during my read-through. Like the other reviews, not too many issues are present. MWright96 (talk) 08:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @MWright96: thanks for another review, I've fixed all the points raised. Courcelles (talk) 10:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Courcelles: Can now promote this entry to GA class. Note: I've made an edit to fix the inconsistency with the date formatting in the references. MWright96 (talk) 11:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]