Talk:Personal Communications Service

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

needs to be updated for more modern understanding[edit]

From skimming this article it's a little unclear how PCS fits into modern (2018 is the time of my writing) cellular services. Does it represent a technology/way of thinking that is now obsolete (e.g. Sprint has dropped PCS from its name)? Or does it have present-day relevance? Proxyma (talk) 20:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yea. Is PCS a wrapper name for other technologies? Are TCPIP based networks PCS, or is this *before* everything ran over the internet? Have I never heard about it because it was only used for a very short time, because it was replaced before it could make its way out of the US? --2001:9E8:2B3A:FD00:7598:EF1D:2A9D:A111 (talk) 08:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

bad style[edit]

It is really bad to start an encylopedia article with citing a technical definition written by and designated for experts in the subject. --2001:9E8:2B3A:FD00:7598:EF1D:2A9D:A111 (talk) 08:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]