Talk:Periodic boundary conditions

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled[edit]

Way too specific. periodic boundary conditions are way more general than the specific applications of molecular dynamics simulations. Most of the text is irrelevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.101.142.157 (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

implementation trick[edit]

For something like MD, when looping through each particle, conventional wisdom is that any "if" statement is slow. I don't know if this is still true on modern CPUs and with good compilers. But, if you want to avoid an "if" statement, then here's an old trick:

"if" statement version:

 (loop over particles)
  if (x <  -xsize/2.0) x=x+xsize
  if (x >=  xsize/2.0) x=x-xsize
 (end loop)

version without "if" statements:

 (loop over particles)
  BC = xsize * f( x / xSize );
  x -= BC
 (end loop)

where f is a function defined such that f(x) = 1 if x > 1/2, f(x) = 0 if -1/2 < x < 1/2, and f(x) = -1 if x < -1/2 (with the assumption that the particle is never more than one box-length away).

Of course, if "f" is defined using an "if" statement, then there's no benefit, but if you have a clever implementation of f, using, e.g. bit-shifts, or a bit-mask, etc., then the code can see a real speed improvement. Lavaka (talk) 16:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Periodic boundary conditions/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I am afraid that "periodic boundary conditions" and "Born-von Karman boundary conditions" have in fact same meaning. Thus, these two Wikipedia articles should be merged.

In my opinion (I am solid state physicist) it is possible and will lead to a more general nature of the topic.

Regards, Kristof Lebecki

Last edited at 07:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 02:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)