Talk:Peniche (fluid dynamics)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What?[edit]

Why is this assessed as "mid" importance across the board? It would seem highly unlikely for something to be assessed the same importance across so many subjects. -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 04:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. And it is not even related to some of the WikiProjects it is currently listed in. I'm removing WikiProject Spaceflight. Cheers. N2e (talk) 21:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

The second ref (Doerffer et al) seems to be a broken link: I get no response. The third (Melber-Wilkending et al) is very slow to load and in any case is incomplete. Are there any analyses post Eden et al (ie post 2006) to confirm their view that gaps, rather than 2D peniches are best?TSRL (talk) 08:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any trouble with the Doerffer link, but maybe it's protected? I haven't seen anything else re: gaps versus peniches. Thanks for the attention to the article. Dohn joe (talk) 18:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
From http://www.task.gda.pl/quart/06-2.html I can get the abstract but not the full paper. Latter yields a file not found error.TSRL (talk) 19:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. I can get both the abstract and the full text through that link. Let me see if I can find another way to the paper. Dohn joe (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]