Talk:Paul Williamson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Paul Williamson is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article cannot stand alone[edit]

Perhaps it can be rescued and added to the catholic ordinariate? But it cannot stand alone unless it is expanded (quickly) to understand as to why this is Noteable.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted because... --DeusImperator (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted this article for speedy deletion but I believe that this can have some value in the way of either English, ecclesiastical or judicial history if written correctly. Article requires expansion into these subject areas. The references seem to indicate that there might be more to this. DeusImperator (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted because... --1549bcp (talk) 17:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frailty, thy name is Williamson, by Andrew Brown, The Independent, 15 April 1997
Dr. Carey and the Glorious Battle
Vicar wins royal wedding inquiry The Times, March 2, 2005
Charity Commission asked to investigate grant to Ordinariate from Thinking Anglicans

Can you expand on this article 1549bcp?[edit]

I understand that given the new ordianariate created that crossing over the Tiber is a fairly ordinary occurring. Perhaps, the article should provide some indication as to why this person is significant. Also, did the case that he brought before the courts have a significance as in breaking new grounds etc.? A little more detail would help as you seem to know much more regarding the subject. DeusImperator (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification Needed Regarding "Vexatious Litigant"[edit]

The article states that Mr. Williamson brought a legal action challenging the validity of the marriage of the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall, yet it also states that he was declared a "vexatious litigant" in 1997 and is not permitted to bring suit in the courts of the United Kingdom. If he was declared a "vexatious litigant" in 1997, and the couple did not marry until 2005, how was he able to bring a lawsuit challenging the validity of the marriage?John Paul Parks (talk) 03:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]