Talk:Paul Maskey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Paul Maskey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Birthday[edit]

Raw data hosted on the British parliament's website is not a reference. Especially when it is contradicted by the Northern Ireland Assembly's profile page which gives his date of birth as 10 June, not 9 June. This is confirmed by two posts on Paul Maskey's own Facebook page, first by him receiving an early (my emphasis) birthday surprise on 9 June, and a post from two years earlier where he says So many birthday wishes today (my emphasis) on 10 June. So I think you know what you can do with your claimed date of 9 June? FDW777 (talk) 12:44, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps one of you should look on my talk page and see if this person’s language is worthy of an administrator. Since you are always quick enough to call out other people’s bad language, let’s see if it’s good enough for you too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:B416:3000:59EA:6F7A:831A:CAD4 (talk) 19:57, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Get tf out of here Facebook is no reliable source LMAO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:B416:3000:59EA:6F7A:831A:CAD4 (talk) 20:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You think the source used for hundreds of MPS DOBs is unreliable but a Facebook post is 😂😂 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:B416:3000:59EA:6F7A:831A:CAD4 (talk) 20:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read WP:ABOUTSELF which clarifies exactly when Facebook pages are reliable, especially if they are verified official pages. Perhaps then you'll realise that you and your British parliament website remain wrong. FDW777 (talk) 22:18, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you two please calm down. Cases like this are clearly not the discretionary sanctions on The Troubles are for, and the language used by both of you is unbecoming of Wikipedians. ~ El D. (talk to me) 17:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]