Talk:Patrick Willis (judge)

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

His rulings[edit]

The lead says, "his rulings were frequent sources of news stories", but the article doesn't give information about what these rulings were. Tyrenius 01:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This seems factually incorrect and a personal attack[edit]

His blatant disregard for evidence in Steven Avery's trial was largely due in part to his determination to not only cover up for a bitterly corrupt police force, but when he admitted illegal interrogations from a minor child as evidence for conviction, it was only a matter of time before his unscrupulous conduct would come to the forefront of the appeals process in both instances

Steve Avery Brenden Dassey[edit]

SHAME ON THIS JUDGE AND EVERYONE CORRUPT INVOLVED. PEOPLE LIKE HIM GIVE THE JUST SYSTEM A BAD NAME!!! 2601:202:8001:2350:E501:8667:A8FB:99B0 (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]