Talk:Parker Pen Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2007[edit]

"the most prestigious and collectible in the world". There's POV, then there's the really-stretching-it-kind-of-POV. Cmon, you can buy this pen at Staples... with a coupon. The most prestigious? Would anybody throw a fit if I reworded this? -Taco325i 01:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that phrase is both Weaselly and NPOV. By all means please do. Fan-1967 02:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External link[edit]

I've removed links to parkerpens.net and Parkercollector.com (note:different URLs, but same site) in the external links section a couple of times. The main reason I removed them was because they had been previously spammed across many different articles by Algabatz (talk · contribs) (once even including both links to the same site). Additionally, the link was self-described as an unofficial fan-site, and, per WP:ELNO, these are to be avoided. I wanted to see what others thought about it. Thanks! Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 15:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parker 51[edit]

Claiming that Parker 51 (in 1941) was made to macth Quink properties of dry (created in 1931) has no factual support, so I rephrased the paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsergio (talkcontribs) 19:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Parker Vector doesn't seem to be independently notable, but would perhaps be worth a mention/redirect here. Boleyn (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Selling price of pen to manufacture[edit]

Whole seller and retailer 117.211.145.216 (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Parker 100" just links to this page[edit]

Under the "See also" section, there's an entry for the Parker 100, but that link just redirects to the same "See also" section. Should this be removed? JimboMcGrimbo (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]