Talk:Pan-European corridors

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: Europe List‑class Mid‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the European Highways Task Force.

Outcome[edit]

So what investments have actually been made in these corridors? Is there a timeline of projects available? -- Beland (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in the wealthier countries like Austria, Italy or Croatia, the corridors are built as freeways. In less wealthy countries like Ukraine or Poland they are built as simple divided highways or usual roads. AFAIK little modernization has occured in most countries, excepting Hungary, Slovenia and Macedonia (the fall of communist regime around 1990 caused advances in transportation). Admiral Norton ^(talk) 16:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creators of the plan[edit]

Who created this stupid plan? Could the person who have edited the main article clearly show which were idented to be railway corridors, which ones road corridors. At least eastern direct North - South railway corridor is totally missing from this plan. I do not mean the Russian corridor but the railway corridor running from Greece to Estonia via Bulgaria, Roumania, Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, and Latvia. Linking the Russian Kaliningrad (Königsberg) enclave to this plan seems to have been more important than opening old traditional railway lines back to international service, as they were up to summer 1939. Kaliningrad enclave with its less than one million inhabitants should be classed to B category and direct railway link to Baltic states without running through Kaliningrad enclave should be considered much more important one. Direct from Berlin via Poland to Lithuania, Vilnius, and Daugavpils. This is omitted totally from the plan by using shortest possible railway lines through Poland. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.198.226 (talk) 16:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

11?[edit]

Corridor Eleven could be on there perhaps? It is supposed to link Romania with Italy. A part of it is under construction in Serbia. [1] (LAz17 (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Corridor 11 id not PanEuropean Corridor. It's a nickname for Serbian additional Highway which should interconect Serbia with Bosnia, Montenegro and Bulgaria. StDeepBlue (talk) 10:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Time for reappraisal[edit]

With the time frame given at the first conference in 1994 the article should present a picture of where these developments currently stand. __meco (talk) 07:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Košice on the map[edit]

Košice isn't on the map between Žilina and Uzhorod. Wünscher (talk)