Talk:Paddington Waterside

A fact from Paddington Waterside appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the redevelopment of the Paddington area of London was intended to be comparable in scale to Canary Wharf?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/November.

Wikipedia

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Keep?[edit]

Is this article really worth keeping? It seems to relate to a housing development in London, but somehow ends up being a "rail related" stub because it occupies former railway land. Should it not be deleted?ColourSarge 17:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should definitely be kept - this is a huge development, as evidenced by the fact that several of the subprojects within it have their own article. It does look a bit healthier now,<g> it could go to WP:GA assessment after a bit of time to prove stability. Le Deluge (talk) 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see it kept. It marks the place of a boater at an important overnight stop between the suburbs and Limehouse Basin, 1 day away. I have a better picture of the Basin taken alongside St Mary's and showing the vibrancy of the buildings there against the water. Not just for boaters, there are opportunities for commuters, and people working in the buildings to sit on a bench and take in something of the atmosphere for a time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midnight Hour (talk • contribs) 18:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Paddington Waterside. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]