Talk:PLO's Ten Point Program

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Need your help[edit]

This article covers a controversial topic which is of great importance for both the Palestinian public and the Israeli public. For this reason, it is very important that the article would be covered objectively and be well balanced - presenting the impact it had on the Palestinians as well as the the impact it had on Israelis (this has been a very debatable topic for many decades amongst the Israeli public).

Anyone who is familiar with the topic is more than welcome to share their knowledge objectively. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 02:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV tag[edit]

Every single source in this article is Israeli. Additional sources are required before the NPOV tag is removed. Zerotalk 11:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources in the article being exclusively “Israeli” does not necessarily imply there is a neutrality issue. Please outline what the neutrality issue is. Mistamystery (talk) 12:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sparse sourcing appears to be primarily suspect, led by the MFA, MEMRI and whatever the NFC is - this is more joke than resembling RS. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A while back, I edited the Res 242 article and I included this, if that helps at all:

At the 12th PNC in Cairo on 8 June 1974, the PLO adopted the Ten-Point Program.Some hardline factions split away to form the Rejectionist Front [1] On the same day the PNC recommended to the PLO executive committee participation in the Geneva process. While reiterating its rejection of UN 242 the PLO should engage in a "framework other than that of resolution 242." The Program, a compromise with rejectionists, marked the first official PLO document that suggested the feasibility of a two-state solution. While Israel was not likely to accept such conditions, the document suggested compromise. According to scholar Shaul Mishal, "a real shift in the PLO position towards the occupied territories;unequivocal support for military struggle has ever since been supplemented by a willingness to consider political means as well." Although a minority, the creation of the Rejectionist Front enabled an argument that the PLO did not speak for all Palestinians and so should not participate at Geneva.[1][2] Selfstudier (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC) (Forgot to sign)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Paul Thomas Chamberlin (18 October 2012). The Global Offensive: The United States, the Palestine Liberation Organization, and the Making of the Post-Cold War Order. OUP USA. pp. 238–9. ISBN 978-0-19-981139-7.
  2. ^ Ian Black; Benny Morris (1991). Israel's Secret Wars: A History of Israel's Intelligence Services. Grove Weidenfeld. ISBN 978-0-8021-3286-4.