Talk:Outsiders (professional wrestling)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

Does Kings of Wrestling (TNA) really deserve a page it's just a month long reshoot of the Outsiders/nWo which can be explained in the Hall and Nash article--KingMorpheus (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agree--TrUcO9311 (talk) 15:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The Chronic 17:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, it is the same team and should be in the same article. Nikki311 21:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per above. The Chronic 00:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose The Outsiders was/is a tag team of Nash and Hall. The Kings of Wrestling was a stable that included the Outsiders. This would be like wanting to merge the New Age Outlaws and DX articles or the Brood/Ministry of Darkness articles. The two are seperate. TJ Spyke 01:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Kings of Wrestling are not really so notable they deserve an article considering they were around for a month and mainly around to get the point across that the Outsiders were back, this is why the merge is taking place--KingMorpheus (talk) 03:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This has been up for merge for the longest why isn't it merged in already.--KingMorpheus (talk) 04:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kings of Wrestling Page Merge Question[edit]

Why was Kings of Wrestling merged with Outsiders? It was a short-lived stable that included Jeff Jarrett and wasn't just the Outsiders. If this has been merged, then what about the Alliance to End Hulkamania page? That was basically the Dungeon of Doom with a few more members and the group only lasted a month as well. Both were the main focus of their respective promotions for that particular month as well. So why is there no continuity here on Wikipedia? TheGary (talk) 10:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]