This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Oshlak (mountain) is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oshlak → Ošljak (mountain) – Requesting on behalf of Anastan. He stated at RMT: restoring name prior to the undiscused move, but I'd like to note this move, which cites this permalink, by Bobrayner, who stated: Article had been moved without discussion, then the redirect was edited. Requesting a move back to the original title. Once there, I'm happy to hold an RM discussion if anybody actually cares about such an obscure page — Andy W.(talk ·ctb) 18:55, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support The current title arrangement makes no sense. Both the mountain and the island have the same name, and it has been decided that neither is primary topic, so one shouldn't be nonsensically disambiguated by converting to ASCII. Pppery 19:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support That was exactly my reason to rename it also, per Ošljak article. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 19:36, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
