Talk:Osage River

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Totally inside Missouri[edit]

Are we sure the river is totally within Missouri? The Siloam Springs article says it comes into a piece of northwest Arkansas. Anlace 20:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • There's a different stream known as "Osage Creek" near Siloam Springs. The name has been corrected on that page by another contributor. Malepheasant 02:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This entry says the Osage River is "The largest river entirely in Missouri" while the entry for the Gasconade River says "It is the largest river that is wholly contained in the state of Missouri". Both can't be correct. Buaya 18:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've removed the claim from the Gasconade River article and requested that sources be cited in this article. Malepheasant 03:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tributaries[edit]

What classifies a river as a tributary worth mentioning? For example, should the Maries River be added to the article? Brrgdw (talk) 09:34, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Osage River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]