Talk:Orton-Gillingham

Linguistics: Phonetics / Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Disability

Orton-Gillingham is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Copyright review.[edit]

A series of edits added material from this site word for word. I reverted to the version prior to those edits.

The headings in the feature section still largely match, but the wording is not a copy paste.

I rev-deled the intervening versions.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 16:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs rewrite[edit]

Looking at sources cited, I find publications by IMSE and other groups that sell Orton-Gillingham training, or redlinks. This article should instead rely on research concerning the efficacy of this method, e.g. on Google Scholar. It was not enthusiastic: "Given the small number of studies, the lack of methodological rigor of the existing studies, and the inconclusive findings of the effectiveness of OG programs, additional research is needed before the scientific basis can be established." HouseOfChange (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]