This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.
A fact from Organized horse fighting appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 May 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
One thing that would be useful to add is that horse fights in a natural setting rarely result in injuries, let alone death; like so many other dominance displays, usually the weaker animal disengages quickly and runs off. This confinement of the animals enhances the injuries and suffering of the combatants Montanabw(talk) 23:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A very good point - it might be difficult to find something specific to horses but I am sure there is a general comment out there. Leave it with me. DrChrissy(talk) 23:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done. DrChrissy(talk) 23:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The second sentence of the lead is a run on sentence that is very difficult to parse. I would like to rewrite it myself, but cannot access the first reference to confirm what is being said. DrChrissy, would you be able to take another look at it and reword it? AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it was rather convoluted. I've made changes - see what you think. DrChrissy(talk) 14:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
