Talk:Organisation for Marxist Unity – New Zealand

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

AFD[edit]

This article was nominated for deletion in Feb. 2008. I closed the discussion as "no consensus". Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Reference"[edit]

I deleted the reference http://www.converge.org.nz/watchdog/00/02.htm Watchdog turns 100: Readers' comments] as it is to a "letters to the editor page" - the only link seems to be that someone named in this article wrote to the newsletter of the cited campaign - hardly evidence of the statement in the article given it is essentially a self-reference.

Overall I question the relevancy of this article. I see that it was scheduled for discussion for deletion twice but I am guessing no one cared enough. Gacole (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Project assessment[edit]

The article implies that this organisation is still active. For an active organisation, I would expect more detail for the article to be start class. I have thus reassessed it as stub class. Schwede 66 14:27, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]