Talk:Order of the Amaranth

Freemasonry Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Requested move 12 January 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 20:16, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Order of the Amaranth → Order of the Amaranth (Freemasonry) – WP:PRECISION, while Order of the Amaranth should redirect to Order of Amarante per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC/WP:COMMONAME. PPEMES (talk) 18:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed - No need to add parenthetical disambiguation for the Masonic group. The two groups are sufficiently disambiguated by distinct spellings, and there is a hat note on both articles to guide anyone who ends up at the “wrong” article. Blueboar (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Blueboar. Not to mention this article gets 10 times as many views. Station1 (talk) 23:28, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.