Talk:Orange County's Credit Union

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconCooperatives Stub‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Article reads like an ad[edit]

I'm normally a vocal critic of deletionism, but this article comes across as an advertisement. I've removed some of the flagrant abuses, like the link to the company's press release and the unsourced quote from the CEO, but I feel that most of this article is either in violation of WP:NPOV or DUE. I'll be flagging the article as NPOV for now. If there's no disagreement in a week or so, I'll clean up the article myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topherwhelan (talkcontribs) 23:01, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening - We apprecipate your feedback about the Credit Union's Wikipedia page. Our intent is to be completely neutral and to only post factual, non-bias information. I was hoping to review your concerns and work together so we can the remove NPOV. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sroc08 (talkcontribs) 01:04, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning - It appears there's no concern about the neutrality of this page, so I'm going to remove the NPOV. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sroc08 (talkcontribs) 9:07, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Unexplained reverts[edit]

In September 2015, I edited this article to remove curly quotes and apostrophes (per MOS), copy-edited the text, removed a long list of unsourced trivia, removed text that was sourced to advertising, removed spam links, and fixed an external link in the infobox. I explained all of this in my edit summary. I also removed article tags that no longer applied. Those edits were summarily reverted by Whereissandra, without explanation, and then the article tags were removed even though they were accurate again. I have undone this editor's undiscussed changes. I ask for a discussion here before reintroducing any of the unsourced, poorly edited content that I removed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]