Talk:Optional stopping theorem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Undefined symbol: [edit]

What does the symbol mean in the condition (c)?

This is the meet. I added a brief description to the text. Zfeinst (talk) 21:05, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Previous talk[edit]

One should add to the proof why E[X1]=E[Xttau], which is the only non-trivial thing in the proof in my opinion. Szepi (talk) 21:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to example section is problematic (as there is not example section). 83.248.213.36 (talk)

The theorem also applies to right-continuous martingales, not just martingales in discrete time.

Of course the proof is somewhat harder but it should at least be mentioned in the article. 77.1.167.9 (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I could be missing something, but it seems like the proof given here is not really correct. In particular, we do not have

.

Also, the use of the dominated convergence theorem is a little confusing--it is not relevant that is finite, but rather that is. The hypothesis may need to be replaced by . (Arghbleargh (talk) 06:44, 18 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

reference section[edit]

The link reference given is not accessible (access forbidden). A new source for the facts of the article is needed. Any text book providing an introduction to martingales should do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quarague (talkcontribs) 10:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Condition (a) not stated properly[edit]

Condition (a) as it is now, is wrong. It should read: The stopping time τ is almost surely bounded, i.e., .

Otherwise the stopping times defined in the Applications section do not fulfill the requirements.