Talk:Optics and vision

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force.

Neuroscience

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notes[edit]

Created article per request at [Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Hotlist of History of Ideas]. The initial article shamelessly copies from other wikipedia articles on each topic. (Hope this is OK) Rewriting, high level integration and a few images would be helpful. Canuck100 (talk) 21:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you would write a lead that explains what the unifying topic of the article is. It comes across as a bit of a hodgepodge at the moment. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

my lead section[edit]

After skimming the history, it's worth mentioning that I wrote the lead by reading this article and summarizing some main points, unlike the previous attempt [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.160.115.10 (talk) 08:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely human-centric article despite claiming this is about other organisms too.[edit]

Somehow you say in your lead that this article is about vision in humans and other organisms yet the entire article is human-centric. Wow people, wow. Please stick to your claim and actually put information on other organisms too. 2001:FB1:97:207:F0F9:4C45:7C28:D130 (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]