Talk:Operation Red Dog

Untitled

They were collborating with a black man? Is this a mistake? That doesn't really make sense from a white nationalist's point of view, ideologically. 68.161.214.21 01:25, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

They also teamed up with a Jew, and planned to murder him when they were done. Have you seen this source for info on Operation Red Dog?

https://operationreddog.com/ 204.48.94.192 (talk) 22:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

That's what i thought.I'd say they were using him as an excuse to invade and had possibly considered overthrowing him at a later stage.That's just what i think however Dermo69

Seems a bit surreal. Would make a good film maybe. --212.84.121.156 01:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

• Yeah, I decided to take a look. The second link, right there on the page, is to a very thorough article that explains it all. There was a three way agreement between John, the racialists, and a mobster to turn Dominica into a HQ for gambling, prostitution, coke manufacturing, smuggling, etc. Everyone wins!...This entry should be changed drastically; for some reason instead of using the good article as a source, it's just lifted the introduction from a very sloppy article on "dominican.net," which later on directly contradicts itself on this absurd point. White supremacists have been willing to collaborate with blacks when it suits their purpose for as long as there's been white supremacists--but obviously not to set up a "white nationalist nation" ruled by a black man. The other story makes perfect sense; if John was willing to do that to his own country just to get back into power, I'm sure he's any black-hater's favorite black of all time.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.212.72.239 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 2 April 2007

Sydney Burnett-Alleyne is I believe the black man they are referring to. I believe Barbados declared him an enemy of the state and they will not allow him now back into the country. The U.S. Military has archived an interview he did with the Barbados daily newspaper. About his few overthrow attempts. [1] pages 20-24. CaribDigita (talk) 04:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

what?

Yeah, I don't quite understand how White Nationalists would cooperate with a Black man to create a White Nationalist nation from a predominanty Black/mulatto country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.102.66 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 17 April 2007

They weren't! Like it says in the talk section just above. Look, white "nationalists" in North America aren't trying to move to a tiny obscure island to create a "white nationalist nation" there; they're saying that USA/Canada are nations belonging to white people, and trying to kick out or exterminate others.

And these particular white nationalists had found a black guy willing to turn a free, black republic into one big coke factory and whorehouse, and send the proceeds to fund white supremacist activity. And they wanted to play ball with him. What's so strange about that? If anything, the part that's a little harder to believe is that a black former head of gov't could have so little pride; but I guess we should never be surprised about the lure of money and power. But I agree; great movie idea.205.212.74.252 22:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Anyone know where to find a copy of the BBC doumentary?

According to Time Magazine [2] it was a BBC documentary that tied Barbados to the plot. CaribDigita (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Accusations that were not validated in court

I am concerned about the fact that some statements implicating David Duke in the plot are treated as factual despite the fact that Duke was convicted of nothing.

Here is the source for the statements implicating Duke: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=XSwdAAAAIBAJ&sjid=SqUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6344,5264715&dq=david-duke&hl=en

Michael Perdue had made a deal with the Federal Government when he made those statements.

Duke and others denied Perdue's statements. Evidently the jury did not find Perdue's statements credible, since Duke ended up not being charged in the plot. Your Buddy Fred Lewis (talk) 02:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

I edited part of the introduction to remove David Duke's name when the NYT citation given did not mention his name. Duke can and probably should be mentioned somewhere in the article as the source noted above does connect him to the subject matter. -Location (talk) 23:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Grenada

I have read the original target was Grenada not Dominica. Shouldn't this be described? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.41.89 (talk) 17:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Operation Red Dog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306065519/http://www.nationnews.com/Politics/26973.htm to http://www.nationnews.com/Politics/26973.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)