Talk:Operation Oyster

Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

CE[edit]

@Gunbirddriver: Altered biblio format to make the sfns work, added isbns, altered them to isbn 13 and hyphenated; Multi-authored works now name1|name2|name3| harv format. Once source not isbn'd as I can't find it, apols. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 07:41, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gleaned some detail from the RAF BC OH, operational code names aren't apostrophe'd; rm from Oyster. The raid section might benefit from some 3rd level headers to break up the text, when you do the finishing touches. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 11:00, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. I will take a look at what you did there so I can clean it up for next time. Thanks for the help. Gunbirddriver (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Twas a pleasure. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 21:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Had a stab at breaking up slabs of text with sub-headers and pics, all suggestive, rv as desired. Keith-264 (talk) 12:10, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CE[edit]

Tidied prose, gave precedence to literary works, shortened sfns auto ed, cite repair, checked for dupe wl etc. Keith-264 (talk) 16:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

casualties[edit]

"Civilian casualties were 150 and 7 German soldiers" German soldiers count as civilians? Wouldn't this be better as "casualties numbered seven German soldiers and 150 civilians" ? 84.215.194.30 (talk) 22:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]