Talk:Operation Julie

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

British crime (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Copyright violation[edit]

Copyright violation has been fixed, perhaps the new article could use the old site as a resource: [[1]] (scroll down to "5. Operation Julie - The best acid ever?")

Sudasana 02:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit surprised at the apparent lack of usable sources on the web for this topic. I would still have deleted the copyvio, but I was expecting it to be a lot easier to rebuild the article than it currently seems to be. I remember reading a book about it some time after the Tyne Tees programme, but I can't imagine what it might have been called. Telsa (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not want to get into a revert war, but the version that has been restored is a restoration of the copyvio: see WP:COPYVIO. It should not be here. Please undo it. (Just paraphrasing it won't be enough, btw, we need sources.) If the only GFDL'd content we have is a stub, that's what we'll have to have. Telsa (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've just undone it again anyway. Telsa (talk) 12:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BBC2 Wales TV program this week[edit]

LSD Millionaires Thursday 1 March (2007) BBC Two Wales/2W 9pm

I've just seen a trailer on TV, like others here I've allways been suprised about the lack of "stuff on the net" about this subject. Wallyjumblat 17:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seized LSD destroyed?[edit]

According to the well established book "Acid Dreams: The Complete Social History of LSD" by Martin Lee and Bruce Shlain the seized 1.3 kilograms of LSD actually went missing after the raid and was never accounted for. The book stresses that this issue is central in importance when considering operation Julie because of the staggering amount of the drug that disappeared after being taken possession of by the authorities. If no source can be found for the claim that it was destroyed then I suggest that it is altered. Yes yes I know, I should do it myself, but I'm at work right now and should get away from this page before it's seen what I'm working on ;) 82.161.163.90 (talk) 11:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only people with reliable sources should add things to articles. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 07:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS I'm not surprised a large amount of LSD went missing, a lot of the cannabis on sale in Birmingham during the early 1980's was known as 'police surplus'.

I don't get the preceding comment. The book referred to is actually a serious source.158.223.181.93 (talk) 16:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Julie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070523105444/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/wales/mid/sites/tregaron/pages/julie_rees.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/mid/sites/tregaron/pages/julie_rees.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Street value of LSD seized[edit]

Based on a news article on the BBC ^[1], one million tabs and enough LSD crystal to make 6.5m more was seized. The value according to this article was £100M (not the £6.5M mentioned). I've updated to the £100M unless there's another ref that categorically states the value of the seized drugs. Londonclanger (talk) 11:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

should the news article street value opinion be contested ??[edit]

(sorry, I'm not a wiki expert edit expert, so apologies for formatting errors)

- there's an inconsistency here - £100 mill for 7.5 mill tabs equates to over £12 a tab. Yet at the very beginning of this article it is reported that a tab cost £1 - rising to only £5 *after* the seizure of such a vast amount. (An obvious explanation is that newspapers are notorious for inflating the street value of drugs bust.) But for whatever reason the stated street value is a grossly misleading figure  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.194.164 (talk) 07:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-37439797

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Leaf Fielding's Tax Assessment as a drugs salesman after Operation Julie.pdf

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Leaf Fielding's Tax Assessment as a drugs salesman after Operation Julie.pdf

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-37439797

[1]