This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Is this intended to be an encyclopedia article, or a guideline for editors? It's currently in the article namespace--suggesting the former--but the tone of the article is rather unencyclopedic in places. The article reads more like legal advice than an impartial description of the subject. If it is intended as a guideline, it belongs in the Wikipedia namespace. Otherwise, it should be cleaned up. --EngineerScotty 04:48, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's intended to be an article that summarises the highlights of the law and legal decisions specifically related to online service providers. It's not intended as a guideline for editors, though it may do that as a side effect. Jamesday 08:53, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]