Talk:Oklahoma State Highway 34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOklahoma State Highway 34 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 27, 2014Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oklahoma State Highway 34/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 16:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can most likely review this article later today, and I can also create a KML in a couple hours or so. TCN7JM 16:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Link Boiling Springs State Park in the lead instead of the route description?
  2. Might be helpful to include what types of interchanges SH-34 uses to enter and exit I-40.
  3. The final four paragraphs in the route description all begin with "SH-34".
  4. !rstlne
  5. "On November first of that year" – I feel like this should just be written as "November 1".
  6. Why aren't the exit numbers used for the interchanges where SH-34 enters and exits I-40?

That's all. This is going on hold. TCN7JM 01:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will get to the other points later tonight, but as for the exit numbers, on the ends I do not include them in the exit column because they are not exits from SH-34, they are exits from I-40. That is, to follow the route in the junction column, I-40, you would not take that exit. —Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 02:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Makes enough sense. TCN7JM 23:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Addressing concerns:
  1. Done.
  2. Done for exit 32, but exit 41 is not a standard interchange type, so I'm not really sure what else I could use to describe it.
  3. Changed two of the paragraphs to not start with SH-34.
  4. I added a general description to the beginning of the route description, but I don't really feel there is anything geographical that is worthy of note that isn't already mentioned in the route description.
  5. Done.
  6. Already addressed above.
Let me know if anything else needs to be fixed. —Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 03:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I will pass this article now. TCN7JM 03:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]