Talk:Odometer fraud

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

driving in reverse to turn back an odometer[edit]

Contrary to what the article says, itis possible to run an odometer backwards by driving in reverse on some older cars. One example is my 1989 oldsmobile cutlass ciera sedan. i could post a video on youtube to attempt to prove it, but i would rather not, because it might give some people ideas(if there isn't a video like that on there already)Vandalism destroyer (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does it not work on the 1961 Ferrari 250 GT California? DanBishop (talk) 03:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On some cars driving in reverse reverses the odometer, on some cars it moves the odometer forward, and on some it does nothing. --Sable232 (talk) 20:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article barely longer than the section in Odometer[edit]

Just saying. I've never called for an articles removal before, but when the article repeats a section of a medium sized article? I won't tag it, but it's something to bear in mind. 94.66.98.5 (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Jonathan Adrian Treloar[reply]