Jump to content

Talk:Odex's actions against file-sharing/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

  1. Well-written:
    (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Green tickY
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Red XN - A lot of claims and claimed in there, which are words to avoid.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Green tickY
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Green tickY
    (c) it contains no original research. Green tickY
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Green tickY
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Green tickY
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Red XN - The claims and claimed sections seem to introduce a POV slanting towards the victims of Odex, which is against the NPOV policy.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Green tickY
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Green tickY
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Green tickY

The article's GAN status will remain on-hold for the next 7 days, please contact me on my talk page when the issues have been rectified. —Atyndall [citation needed] 07:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for reading so closely and providing this review. I removed instances of 'claim' [1], save one which is intended as a legal term "copyright claims". If there are any other points, please let me know. --maclean 23:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]