Talk:Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

"Although his making religion the sole factor of this evolution was a perversion of the historical facts, the book was so consistent throughout, so full of ingenious ideas, and written in so striking a style, that it ranks as one of the masterpieces of the French language in the 19th century."

Why would this be a "perversion of the historical facts"?

"Fustel de Coulanges was the most conscientious of men, the most systematic and uncompromising of historians."

This, as well as much of the article, sounds rather biased.

somebody added this little tid-bit "This article is ludicrously reverential. If the author wrere still alive it would be called brown-nosing."

It should probably be removed but the article does need to be toned-down a little.199.76.188.135 (talk)

Please note that our article was extracted from the 1911 edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica. It may well have been carried forward from an earlier edition. NRPanikker (talk) 15:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link to works:[edit]

BTW.: I found one: http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/fustel/