This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Country MusicTemplate:WikiProject Country MusicCountry Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Perhaps User:Walter Görlitz can explain what specifically on this article he considers "unsourced material"? Thankyoubaby (talk) 04:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As stated on your talk page: The AfD made it clear WP:NTOUR was not met. That was "Concert tours are probably notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Such coverage might show notability in terms of artistic approach, financial success, relationship to audience, or other such terms. Sources that merely establish that a tour happened are not sufficient to demonstrate notability. Tours that cannot be sufficiently referenced in secondary sources should be covered in a section on the artist's page rather than creating a dedicated article. A tour that meets notability standards does not make all tours associated with that artist notable. Michael Jackson's 1988 Bad is an example of a notable concert tour." So until that makes it into the article, leave the tag. It's not worth going through an AfD so soon after it was closed as no consensus. I'd be glad to remove that tag and place {{notability}}. If you would rather do that to avoid an edit war over it, feel free to.
It's not worth going through an AfD again because you know it will end with the same result. Please read WP:V and let me know where this article needs improvement, because none of what you said above is relevant. Thankyoubaby (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. If this goes up to AfD again it may gain more interest from non-fans of Twain's and fans of Wikipedia, but it's not worth wasting the project's time. What I wrote (I didn't speak at all, I wrote) was quite relevant. I placed the notability tag. Cheers. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If it was relevant why did you remove it? Thankyoubaby (talk) 00:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You seem incapable of understanding logic. You complained. I allowed you to do the right thing and decide whether you wanted a notability tag or the sources tag. The idea was to shut you up. I see it didn't work. Which would you like? Either answer or shut up. Cheers. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest you rewrite that very uncivil comment. Thankyoubaby (talk) 18:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How exactly would you like me to rewrite it? Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry I was uncivil toward you. But the point still remains: you have no place in this project when you don't address point made to you and when your lack the competence to respond to questions that are posed to you and don't assume good faith on the part of editors. If you can't pick-up your game, it's best to leave. In short, the tag was added at a time when more references were required. At the advice of another editor, we changed the tag to a notability one as they were similar, but it was the better choice. Removing the first tag without adding a second was both irresponsible and wrong.
If you intend to respond with an obtuse or opaque comment like either of the previous, I will stop assuming good faith and simply ignore you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Any credits of staff on tour with her? Shannamommy1 (talk) 01:45, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Per the news release on Shania's official website "Shania Announces 2018 NOW Tour". It's simply just called the Now Tour. --97.127.21.24 (talk) 02:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There's already an article for that. We'll likely have to determine which is the primary topic at some point. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:21, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So if you know why they exist, why are you assuming this article should move? Now Tour should become a DAB page and the other article should move to make way for that. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Because the page is current called "Shania Now Tour". The actual tour name is just "Now Tour". Shania is not part of the tour name. --97.127.21.24 (talk) 02:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please read MOS:DAB. It is unlikely that it will become "Now Tour", unless of course it becomes one of the highest-selling tours of the year. The most likely outcome will be that we move this article to Now Tour (Shania Twain). The other article would become Now Tour (Maxwell) and Now Tour would be disambiguation page pointing to those two pages. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I knew that already......the point is that Shania needs to be removed from the tour page. --97.127.109.186 (talk) 06:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
