Talk:Nova Pilbeam

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography assessment rating comment[edit]

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

Barely a Start class.

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How recent is any information that we have that she may be still alive? As she has just turned 90 she could be moved to "possibly living people". PatGallacher (talk) 20:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

She's still alive. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe so, but what is your authority for that? PatGallacher (talk) 20:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There would be obituaries, she's quite widely known both in the Los Angeles film community and in southern England. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see also Nova Pilbeam: The Lady Vanishes (www.independent.co.uk, 2007), I should pull something from this when I have time Gwen Gale (talk) 01:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nova4.jpg[edit]

Image:Nova4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]