Talk:North Geelong Warriors FC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for getting this started! Always good to see another 'red dead link' (or whatever you want to call it) get turned into a blue working link. Blackmissionary 10:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:North geelong.gif[edit]

Image:North geelong.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Origin Of Club[edit]

Please note that the article states that the club was started by migrants in 1967. It should be made clear that the club was created by migrants but those individuals who created the club were all members of the Croatian National Resistance HNO. The club was initially financied by the HNO then slowly as the years progressed other organisations like HOP and HNV were also heavily involved. This should be noted as many don't know the truth about it's creation.

Removal of Close Paraphrasing[edit]

Close paraphrasing removed as website actually used the wikipedia article and not vice versa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brigate Rossonere (talkcontribs) 01:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]