Talk:Nodens

Celts Low‑importance

	Nodens is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle-earth Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyvio[edit]

I've removed two paragraphs from the "Centres of worship" section, because they were lifted wholesale from Celtnet.org (spotted because it included the phrase "Bronze reliefs (of which the image above is a portion)", but no image). --Nicknack009 21:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another one - some of the material was taken from the Gods of Roman Britain page of Roman-Britain.org. There may be others. I'm giving the page a heavy rewrite with proper cites so as not to violate copyright. --Nicknack009 22:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, rewrite done. I've removed the etymological explanations which seem to be based on a trawl through Celtic word-lists on the internet as original research, and incorporated information on the inscriptions from the two sites linked above, with citations. Anything further from reputable sources can now be added. Although it's possible that the "identification" with Silvanus may be a misunderstanding of the inscription by a man called Silvianus - can anyone shed any light? --Nicknack009 23:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the rewrite. Can I quickly ask whether you verified the dates each identical piece of text was written, so we can be sure that our editor copied them, and not the other way around? The Internet Archive may help here. Carcharoth 17:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pages at Roman-Britain.org say they were last edited in 2005, and cite their sources. The CeltNet page also dates itself to 2005, and seems to be at least partly based on the Roman-Britain pages. Yes, I think we can be certain that the previous version of this article copied from them, not vice versa. Ideally this article should be based on proper sources like the ones Roman-Britain.org cites, but in the meantime it's better to cite tertiary sources than to copy them without attribution. --Nicknack009 17:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant. Thanks for checking that. Carcharoth 00:31, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latin inscriptions found in Britain should be referenced with RIB (Roman Inscriptions Britain) or CIL (Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum) numbers, preferably the former, surely. RIB Volume 1 references to Nodens are 305, 306, 307, 616, 617. 305-7 are in Lydney Park, Glos. and 616 & 617 are in Cockersand Moss, Lancs. GermanicusCaesar (talk) 13:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Machen[edit]

How can Machen be inspired by the Lydney Park excavations, if the excavations took place in the 1920s and Machen wrote in 1890s? 213.243.182.196 (talk) 15:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nodens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neptune inscription[edit]

What's the inscription to deus Nodens Neptune? The closest one I can find a record of is RIB 1, 1694 (CIL VII, 708) from Vindolanda, but that reads "Deo / Neptuno / ara(m) [p]o/s(uit) [1]NO". Presumbaly "[.]no" is part of the name of the dedicant, and almost certainly not part of the name of the god... Q·L·1968 ☿ 19:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]