Talk:No. 77 Wing RAAF

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the No. 77 Wing RAAF article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

No. 77 Wing RAAF has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 11, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 19, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that before the Battle of North Borneo, No. 77 Wing RAAF surgically attacked targets at Labuan as few as 100 m (330 ft) from Allied demolition teams laying charges on the invasion beach?

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Military history: Aviation / South Pacific / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War II task force

Australia: Military history Mid‑importance

	Australia portal No. 77 Wing RAAF is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:No. 77 Wing RAAF/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 18:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
prose: (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments[edit]

1. Wing headquarters. Suggest - No. 77 wing headquarters

I didn't use "No. 77 Wing" because I'd used the name in the preceding sentence. Is there another construction you could go with, like "The wing's headquarters" or "Its headquarters"?
- Ah k, and yer your change is fine.

2. Suggest you add a second column to the notes to reduce the height of that section.

Done.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 18:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tks for reviewing! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Passed. Good job Ian. Thurgate (talk) 13:28, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you very much. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]