Talk:Night of the Comet

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source needed on video game high scores[edit]

See this removal: [1]. It's quite obvious to anyone who ever played a video game that when you beat the 6th highest score, the previous 6th highest score just moves down to the 7th highest score, rather than disappearing from the top 10 list entirely. But nonetheless somebody reverted my edit saying so, and asked for proof that this is how they work. Can anybody provide this proof ? StuRat (talk) 17:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This Needs Work[edit]

This article needs a lot of work. The synopsis is chronologically out of order and partially incorrect. I cleaned up some grammar and fixed up a lot of awkward sentences, but there's a lot of work that needs to be done. Plus, there's a mention of the movie's association with "developing trends" that seems so wrong.

First, it's hardly a trend if only one other film touched upon the return of Halley's Comet. Second, though I cleaned it up and left it in, the other trend of the VHS market seems to be irrelevant when we later read that the film was released on VHS in 1990. Fermentor 06:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What part of the synopsis do you think is wrong? It looks fine to me. Clarityfiend 16:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the scene with the crazed store clerks happens after Hector leaves the girls and after Samantha draws the attention of the researchers by going on the radio; Hector has no part in that scene. Plus, I don't think they were actually store clerks and they weren't undead—the comet doesn't kill people it just turns them into crazies, kind of like "28 Days Later", and then into piles of dust. The whole shopping scene takes place after the radio station scene, the radio station is the first place the girls go and it's where they meet Hector. Also, the researchers are blown up at the end, they don't just die off from lack of blood. Fermentor 00:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC) P.S. It guess it doesn't need a LOT of work, but it could use a bit of help.[reply]

Okay. I watched it again and fixed the errors. Hey, who needs a life? Not all the villains were blown up though. Clarityfiend 05:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it could probably be cited that us fans of "Night of the Comet" have no life! j/k :D Fermentor 08:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this is wrong. Night of the Comet was released on VHS by CBS/Fox in 1985. It was released again by Goodtimes Video in 1990. There was also a Betamax release but I am still trying to find out the year. Phaid 19:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I figured it was released earlier than 1990. With a movie like that they must have been banking on rental sales which makes the comment about the studio taking the advantage of the video market seem more relevant. One change I made about a week back was that I deleted the part written about how "VHS tapes sold for $100 so it might not have made much back" or something along those lines. It's true that VHS tapes would sell for that much, but only for one to three months before the consumer edition came out. Films were available to rent well before they were available to purchase.

Good clean-up on the summary, btw, looks much nicer.Fermentor 09:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've rephrased some of the summary to make the meaning a little clearer. It read as though Hector's plan was to rescue Reggie then commit suicide. 77.99.100.107 11:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm grateful for the earlier efforts on the synopsis, but having just watched the film, I'd like to note the synopsis is still woefully inadequate, with some events out of sequence, some things misleading, and other things misunderstood. Additionally it seems oblivious to the dramatic reversal of expectations around Audrey's presentation, which could be difficult to put into a synopsis but still worthwhile. Other notes: Regina doesn't realize what the zombie is eating - technically it's true that she sees him eating Larry, though we have to infer this - until later. She doesn't run away; she rides Larry's motorcycle. The shadowy group has no obvious government links (note the prominent logo) and is called a "think tank;" Regina doesn't turn off the life support systems there, but Hector accidentally does. There may be some other noteworthy omission or error that I've missed, but that seems to be the highlights. By the way, do you think DMK always had that car? I'm sure he's looted the dealership, so maybe he swapped the plate off his old Datsun. Or maybe the kid really isn't DMK. We will never know. --Edwin Herdman 14:55, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

I've addressed some of the issues you raised. What I'm concerned about most is whether the creatures were ever called "zombies". Clarityfiend (talk) 20:50, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section[edit]

As per the No original research policy, I have removed the analysis section. Feel free to find sources that relate the same and reinstate it.

REMOVED SECTION:

Analysis[edit]

Night of the Comet was both a comedic film, such as the Return of the Living Dead series of films, and a commentary on modernized culture. For example, despite the comet wiping out nearly all of the population of a major urban area, the automated functions of the city are still working and give the impression that nothing is out of place. The voice of a radio station DJ, who at first appears as a sign of life to the survivors, is revealed to be a set of pre-recorded tapes running on an automated loop; in an effort to give the impression of employing a live DJ, the recordings featured the DJ reading letters from listeners and complaining about "being trapped in a booth all day."
This film can also be associated with two developing trends in cinema from the early to mid 1980's: a cultural obsession with the re-appearance of Halley's Comet (which returned in 1986), touched upon in other films of the period including Tobe Hooper's Lifeforce; and the profitability of low-budget 'horror/slasher' flicks which were extremely popular with teenage audiences in the early to mid 1980's. The emerging home video rental market also increased the chances of a low-budget film making a profit, as some money could be made back in the rental market.

Video Game[edit]

What was the name of the game that the main character was playing at the beginning of the flick? Also, did they ever find out who DMK was? White_Bishop (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC, the game she was playing was Tempest. ArcAngel (talk) (Review) 17:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was the game. Also, the guy who nearly runs Sam down at the very end is Danny Mason Kenner, DMK according to the IMDb and TCM credits. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cover art blurb[edit]

Tweaked the Village Voice bit about criticizing the cover. Connelly's attribution of the synopsis to Shout! is misleading - this is the exact same promotional copy from MGM used on the DVD case from years prior. --Jtalledo (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

@Megainek: can you explain why you're edit warring to remove sourced commentary from the lead? The lead is supposed to summarize the the rest of the article, including the reception. What policy or guideline do you think justifies removing this content? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]