Talk:Nick Katzman

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nick Katzman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Nick Katzman was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 2, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

I am a fan of Katzman and Winslow, and know them both. I think Katzman is notable, merely based on the Google test and his associations. His extreme shyness and lack of exposure to the American mass market means he's not well known; he's not famous for being famous. Bearian 22:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

Please don't take this offensively, but this article needs alot of work before it can even be considered a Good Article.

This is a very short article for a musical artist who has been active for approximately 40 years. I needs expansion work. It's good for summarizing what he has done, and can be used in the lead, but you need prose that goes into greater detail of what he's done at each stage of his career.
Inline citations are good, and you seem to have a good amount of sources. Can you suck any more information out of them?
Once expansion work has been done, you will have to change the lead accordingly. See WP:LEAD.
Can you get any pictures of Katzman? Good articles can illustrate the subject using free images.
Once you have expanded the article and worked on it more, I would suggest you ask for a peer review before re-nominating it.

Do not be discouraged by this. I understand you have put some work and effort, and I must say you have a good start. Just keep working on it, and try to tell more about what this artist has done throughout the 40 years of his career. Good luck! Cheers. -- Reaper X 23:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement[edit]

I am working to improve this article as an ongoing project. Bearian (talk) 20:54, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Nick Katzman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:45, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]