Talk:Nicholas Porter Earp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge the two articles. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 14:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Earp family[edit]

This article is substantially about Nicholas Earp's family life as is the article about the Earp family. The article about the Earp family is smaller and contains information that can be interleaved with this article. The two articles combined will make one much more informative article. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 19:37, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree/Comment/Alternative merge I'm normally not one for reducing information, but if there's over-information about his progeny on the NPE article, that should be removed the EF article kept as is. If anything, the Family article should be kept and this one merged into it with Nicolas getting a paragraph or two and that's that. The Earp family, namely Wyatt and his brothers' generation are much more commonly thought of as a unit than NPE is as an individual and the average reader would be more likely to be finding a summary of the comings and goings of Morgan, Virgil, et al. Especially after, say, watching Tombstone. It's nice to have family summaries and have their articles named for the family, rather than having to go to each family member's unique page, or having to go up a generation on the tree to look down at all of them for a brief synopsis of each descendant. JesseRafe (talk) 23:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with merger if we try to make the resultant article a repository for everything about the Earp family that isn't covered in the separate articles about the famous Earp brothers. Each of the famous brothers can have about 2 sentences under their subheading, on Earp family, per WP:SS and then their article can serve as the "main article" for the subheading. Similarly, for each of the famous Earp brothers (and perhaps a few commonlaw wives) we can just connect to this one with a short summary also, when it comes to the family bio sections of THEIR articles. That all works.SBHarris 00:32, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Working on completing the merge over the next week or so. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 04:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Orphaned references in Nicholas Porter Earp[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Nicholas Porter Earp's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "virgiltestimony":

  • From Wyatt Earp: Linder, Douglas, ed. (November 19–22, 1881). "Testimony of Virgil Earp in the Preliminary Hearing in the Earp Case". Famous Trials: The O. K. Corral Trial. Retrieved February 6, 2011. From Turner, Alford (Ed.), The O. K. Corral Inquest (1992)
  • From Virgil Earp: Linder, Douglas, ed. (2005). "Testimony of Virgil Earp in the Preliminary Hearing in the Earp Case". Famous Trials: The O. K. Corral Trial. Retrieved 6 February 2011. From Turner, Alford (Ed.), The O. K. Corral Inquest (1992)
  • From Ike Clanton: Douglas Linder (2005). "Testimony of Virgil Earp in the Preliminary Hearing in the Earp Case". Famous Trials: The O. K. Corral Trial. Retrieved 2011-02-06.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nicholas Porter Earp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nicholas_Porter_Earp&oldid=1207075931"