This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Adding new information and enhancing a site is not vandalism. Remember articles are not private property & you cannot just revert back to remove valuable contributions. Tut Tut. Rosser 12:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rosser - welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted your edits because you had deleted large sections of the article without giving your reasons or discussing any proposed deletions on this page. If you want to remove large sections of an article then discuss the edits here first. As you say, articles are not private property. That applies to you as well. Mrslippery 15:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can see Rosser made absolutely no deletions during his editing of this article, instead merely adding a few details which were then reverted by Mrslippery for no good reason whatsoever. I think people need to get their facts straight before they start accusing people of vandalism. Rosser has been a Wikipedia member for many months with many worthwhile contributions. --Dreamer84 23:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That is certainly my understanding of my actions. Rosser 23:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The content had definitely gone, but perhaps the page did not load correctly, or someone else had made the deletion. My apologies if I got it wrong. Mrslippery (talk) 17:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No content was removed when I looked at it, and the History revisions of the page back this up. I'd say that the page not loading correctly your end is the most likely explanation. --Dreamer84 (talk) 19:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
