Talk:Never Too Far/Hero Medley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNever Too Far/Hero Medley has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 9, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Untitled[edit]

Please get the song it is one of my favorites.

Fair use rationale for Image:Totp carey.JPG[edit]

Image:Totp carey.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Never Too Far/Hero Medley/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk) 22:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • By the way, two of my favorite songs from Mariah Carey. I'll try my best with reviewing, however, if not satisfy with my review. I'll simply ask for a second opinion. Good luck, AJona1992 (talk) 22:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm glad you enjoy them as much as me :) Sure, take your time!--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 22:20, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Lead

"co-written and co-produced by the former and Walter Afanasieff" - why is "former" there?

Background and Recording

"During this period, Carey older label" - missing a letter "Carey's"

"having written the former with Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis" - again, not sure why "former" is stated here?

There For Me

Delink "Walter Afanasieff". Don't really need to link his name two times, we got the idea above this section.

Composition

"In an interview with Fred Bronson, Carey described the her original feelings" - Do you want to remove "the" from this sentence?

Live performances

"to be aired on December 21." - does this mean the special will be airing this year? If not then maybe stating "which aired on December 21 of that same year."

Notes

I'm going to put the article  On hold for further development for seven days. Good luck, AJona1992 (talk) 22:27, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on this article. It has now  Pass. Cheers, AJona1992 (talk) 01:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per say (sic)[edit]

Hi there :D Just enquiring into changing 'per say [sic]' to 'per se' :) I'm all very new to this :) However, correct me if I'm wrong, aren't 'per se' and 'per say', phonetically speaking, identical? :) How is the conclusion being drawn that she said 'per say' when the message wasn't encoded on a written medium and I as such feel we can't assume that she confused 'say' for 'se'? :) Again I've only recently started doing edits of this nature and so I look forward to a reply as I clearly as of yet to do not understand how such matters are discerned and I'm sure there's reasoning behind this edit :) Thanks in advance :) Can't Let Go (talk) 01:50, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 110.33.195.166 (talk) 00:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]