Talk:Never Say Never (Brandy album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Brandyeverythingido.jpg[edit]

Image:Brandyeverythingido.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Brandy-have you ever.jpg[edit]

Image:Brandy-have you ever.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Brandy u don't know.jpg[edit]

Image:Brandy u don't know.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Brandy top of the world.jpg[edit]

Image:Brandy top of the world.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Brandy alomst.jpg[edit]

Image:Brandy alomst.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Theboyismine.jpg[edit]

Image:Theboyismine.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The Boy Is Mine.jpg[edit]

The image Image:The Boy Is Mine.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

Category:High-importance Album articles

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Brandy Norwood which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources on Sales discussion[edit]

Please discuss the sources on the album sales here before reverting. Karst (talk) 14:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why those are not reliable sources? I just used an article of Yahoo. There's a lot of webarchive of news and articles used in Wikipedia. Like these two on Janet Jackson's The Velvet Rope (1 2), Madonna's Bedtime Stories (1 2) and many more. Just for example this article about BMG Music Clubs it is used in many Wikipedia pages. --PassenzaT (talk) 04:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Certifications[edit]

hey I added the correct links to the certifications I added links from the regions actual music website that certify albums, that archived article that was used as a source for the certifications was bogus it stated that the album was certified in certain regions and when I went to the region music website to search for the certifications nothing pops up for example that archived source states that never say never is certified in Germany but when I went to the Germany music website known as Musikindustrie i typed in brandy and the only thing that she has certified in germany is two singles ( the boy is mine & another day in paradise) never say never isn't certified there Instead of using that Archived yahoo article as a source for certifications how about we use the sources regarding certifications that are provided by the all of the regions musical website on their certification section of the websites OkIGetIt20 (talk) 22:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)OkIGetIt20[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Never Say Never (Brandy album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide sales for the album[edit]

  • There is no way that the album sold 18 million. Certified sales have it at 8.2 million sold worldwide.[1]Meddymarl (talk) 00:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hello, I figured when you made your edits you used this website as a source. This is not a reliable source. B talk
  • I agree, I have no idea where that screenshot source comes from, and the editor will not disclose that information.B talk
  • It's from a press release via Warner Music.Meddymarl (talk) 23:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then why do you have Rhino.com as a source?Meddymarl (talk) 00:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Meddymarl: Other stuff existing is not a valid argument, it's called whataboutism; I removed it now as unreliable. However, you are, inadvertedly, admitting that both sources are from Rhino and that you are inexplicably using an older version of that page. (CC) Tbhotch 15:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References