Talk:Netherlands Indies guilder

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Indonesia Mid‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

adjective[edit]

When have you ever heard of the adjective Netherlands Indian? It ought to be Netherlands Indies, as it was originally.
Dove1950 11:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Divisions[edit]

Until 1802, the Netherlands Indies gulden was subdivided into 20 stuiver, each of 4 duit, as in the Netherlands. However, according to the stuiver and Dutch gulden, the Dutch stuiver was divided into 8 duit or 16 penning. So, it woudl seem odd for the Netherlands Indies duit to be worth twice as much as in the Netherlands itself. Nik42 05:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now explained in the text.....Sumbuddi (talk) 15:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gulden = Rupiah[edit]

Throughout this period, "gulden" or guilder was simply translated with rupiah in Malay and Javanese. So to avoid confusion, I think it's safe to say the terms are synonymous. From the 19th century onwards, the denomination was enscribed in Malay (Arabic) and Javanese (Javanese script) on the reverse of guilder coinage. In both language the term rupiah was used. See for instance http://www.catawiki.nl/catalogus/munten/landen/nederlands-indie/177505-nederlands-indie-14-gulden-1945 190.98.49.147 (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:IND-(NethEastInd)-1-Dutch Administration-1 Gulden (1815).jpg to appear as POTD soon[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:IND-(NethEastInd)-1-Dutch Administration-1 Gulden (1815).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 18, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-12-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

A banknote for one Netherlands Indies gulden. This note was issued in 1815 as part of the first Dutch government-issued paper money in the Netherlands Indies. However, in 1818 the issuing bank—De Bank Courant en Bank van Leening—was dissolved due to a lack of capital, and six months later, this first series of notes was declared worthless.Banknote: De Bank Courant en Bank van Leening (image courtesy of the National Numismatic Collection, National Museum of American History)

Archive – More featured pictures...

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Netherlands Indies gulden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110718022737/http://www.kitlv-journals.nl/index.php/btlv/article/viewFile/3167/3928 to http://www.kitlv-journals.nl/index.php/btlv/article/viewFile/3167/3928

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]