Talk:Nepalese Armed Forces

Nepal Top‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: National / Asian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Tag[edit]

I put the contradiction tag because the organisation and strength sections completely contradict each other, stating very far apart figures. --HJV 00:09, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to merge with with Nepalese Army. all branches of the military are part of the army.--Jiang 11:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am in the process of updting this section with the latest info. I,m short on time so it may take a bit of time for me to complete it.--MED12345678

I'd support the merge and urge that the article(s) be rewritten. Both this and the Nepalese Army article linked above are a bit of a mess. MrZaius^talk 12:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the equipment inventory of nepal army is needs a major revison. nepal army has never used AK 47 or L85A2. similarly, nepal does not have fighter aircraft of any kind. nepal does have 2/3 Antonov An-28 but not 22 as stated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.159.12.200 (talk) 19:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need Info Check[edit]

Article requires major revision or complete rewrite. Lacks some of the most basic information, such as current troop strength.

Information on vehicle/equipment inventory seems like an original claim and completely fraudulent.

The Nepalese Army, with a supposed budget of 57 million dollars does not have nearly 20,000 Armored Personnel Carriers, and 51,000 120mm mortars, totaling about 75,000 artillery pieces in total. A single 120mm shell costs hundreds of dollars just for comparison.

I will do my best to heavily revise the article in the following weeks. Gryffon (talk) 12:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NUMBERS[edit]

Hi What is really bothering me is where the heck are people getting these numbers for the amount of vehicles and weapons in the NEPALESE MILITARY inventory.... i mean that is just ridiculous. how can napal operate 410x WZ551B APC when there is less than 3,000 of them in the world most are in chinese operations 1,200 whilst the rest are spread out, I have not seen any evidence that nepal even possess this apc. same goes for the Casspir apc 9240x units ohhh come on there was less than 4000 units build in the wole world and today there is less than half operational and again. this page needs major cleanup62.31.57.185 (talk) 15:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nepalese Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130513035552/http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2008/jul/jul23/news08.php to http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2008/jul/jul23/news08.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 July 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 14:45, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– To match the main article Nepali Army. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, and move Nepali Army to Nepalese Army, as NGRAM shows Nepalese is in wider use.--Bob not snob (talk) 07:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Bob not snob – The common name is 'Nepalese'. RGloucester — ☎ 01:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

How?[edit]

Budget $US 20 billion(2011) how? - Owais ^Talk 00:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]